<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MVP on Lee Goldsworthy</title>
    <link>https://leegold.com/tags/mvp/</link>
    <description>Recent content in MVP on Lee Goldsworthy</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-au</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://leegold.com/tags/mvp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Vibe coding: proof of concept, prototype, then hire an engineer</title>
      <link>https://leegold.com/posts/vibe-coding-proof-of-concept-prototype-then-hire-an-engineer/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 18:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://leegold.com/posts/vibe-coding-proof-of-concept-prototype-then-hire-an-engineer/</guid>
      <description>Original post on X&#xA;So which is it? &amp;ldquo;The next generation of billion-dollar software companies will be built by Vibe Coders&amp;rdquo;, or &amp;ldquo;Vibe Coding is only good for producing billions of security flaws&amp;rdquo;. X and Linkedin are riddled with both takes, and neither are terribly useful imho.&#xA;Both have elements of truth, but while I think Danial&amp;rsquo;s take of &amp;ldquo;Be careful which Vibe Coder you trust&amp;rdquo; is more nuanced, it still doesn&amp;rsquo;t tell the story for me.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The $20k a month AWS bill with no revenue</title>
      <link>https://leegold.com/posts/the-20k-a-month-aws-bill-with-no-revenue/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://leegold.com/posts/the-20k-a-month-aws-bill-with-no-revenue/</guid>
      <description>&amp;ldquo;I had $20k/month in AWS bills and no revenue&amp;rdquo;&#xA;Do product engineering types have a responsibility to first time founders that goes beyond build and deploy, or is this a case of &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s everyone&amp;rsquo;s right to set their own money on fire?&amp;rdquo;&#xA;I&amp;rsquo;m reflecting on how this year I&amp;rsquo;ve now seen seven examples of how entities within the Australian tech industry have happily taken significant sums (think $250k) from founders to build lavish MVPs, without feeling beholden to take even basic steps to check if the founder is ready to be building an MVP, like have they:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Before you start your MVP</title>
      <link>https://leegold.com/posts/before-you-start-your-mvp/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://leegold.com/posts/before-you-start-your-mvp/</guid>
      <description>The Dream Link to heading You&amp;rsquo;ve worked in the field for 10 or 20 years, you&amp;rsquo;ve lived the problem first-hand, you&amp;rsquo;ve got this idea for a product. You know you won&amp;rsquo;t be a millionaire overnight, but your early revenues from the product will guide what features you build next. You just need to find &amp;ldquo;someone who knows tech&amp;rdquo;, and you&amp;rsquo;re ready to start building&amp;hellip;&#xA;&amp;hellip;is a fantasy we tell ourselves as founders.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
